The Tune (Deaf Crocodile)

Microloops galore. Nearly every shot begins with a microloop. Microloops frequently occur mid-shot, too. Duplicated frames are separated by one or two frames, never breaking persistence of vision. You won’t see them all, but you’ll definitely notice some of the ones that happen mid-shot. They are very hard to demonstrate. In these samples, I put the repeated frames next to each other, with the frame number on top, so you can see that these are the exact same frames.

Frozen cloning isn’t a huge issue, but it still happens, and it’s crude and ugly as sin:

The Flying House – Dreams of a Rarebit Fiend

My complaints with this interesting re-working are solely on technical issues (though no one should call this a restoration, ever).

Pulldown issues. Stuttering, like a speed-corrected silent encoded at 24 fps…

Frame number in yellow.

…and dropped frames, like a poor PAL-NTSC conversion:

Intertitle that loops a handful of frames for its duration. I hate it in new versions of silents, and it definitely shouldn’t happen when an artist has complete control on reworking an old work (still image sample):

Your Face / Guard Dog

In contrast to the feature, the two shorts look great. I didn’t see any restoration artifacts when spot-checking, whereas I came across multiple artifacts at every spot I looked at in The Tune.

About the disc itself…

I hate fancy disc menus. The BD menu has a short loop FROM THE CLIMAX of the film that plays over the entire menu. Heaven forbid you need more than a few seconds to make a selection. I rushed for the mute button.

Zoom shit:

I don’t care how interesting the interviews are, I’m not watching Zoom meetings. They’re low-effort and look like garbage. Look at that screenshot. They didn’t even agree on horizontal or vertical. Yeah, low budget, blah, blah. But you could, like, you know, EDIT. And FRAME. And CROP. We don’t need to watch a 10 GB hour-long video of this.

The Tune, Your Face, and Guard Dog were processed by Academy Film Archive.

In the Realm of the Senses (1976)

The New Beverly just ran a 35mm print from 2008, still in very good condition and with excellent color. Eclair’s restoration, on the UHD from Carlotta, has completely messed-up color. In screencaps here, you can see how it’s now tinged yellow and blue. Snow and geisha makeup should be white, not urine-colored. HD Numerique has a comparison between the UHD and Criterion BD here. Eclair’s skin tones veer purple (yikes!). In every instance, the Criterion disc has color that is a good approximation to the print that I just saw.

Fantasia (1990 version)

Later versions of Fantasia (1940) are more accurate in terms of the ordering and amount of footage, which I like, but the 1990 version is perhaps the version I like best. This is what the New Beverly Cinema runs in 35mm, and I’ve been lucky to see it several times now, including this afternoon.

The negatives were manually cleaned and then photochemically copied. Without any computer processing, the 1990 version, on LD/VHS, is probably closest to what the film actually looks like, including grain, cel dust, and other beautiful flaws as a result of being made by hand under intense pressure. The 2000 version, on DVD, compares favorably, but Corey Burton replacing Deems Taylor’s voice is hard to swallow. I don’t understand why Disney, of all companies, didn’t hire a soundalike. After all, they did it for Bedknobs and Broomsticks (1971). The 2010 version, on BD, is de-grained, stabilized, cleaned, and de-flickered to death, in addition to being subjected to Disney’s terrible color grading. Avoid it.

The 2010 version smooths out what I consider the most thrilling part of the film: Ave Maria. In earlier versions, it flickers and shakes like crazy, giving the feeling that this whole audacious undertaking could fall apart at any frame, which, needing a fourth take and completed a day before premiering, it almost did. It’s a dreamy, breathtaking artifact of imperfection, but the ’10 de-flickered it away.

The ’90 also did the best censoring of Pastoral Symphony. Let’s face it, Disney is not going to show this uncut, so the quality of the censoring matters. The ’90 uses crops and pans. If you didn’t know it was censored, you wouldn’t know (and, indeed, I didn’t for the longest time). The ’00 crops more aggressively (it remains the largest grain I’ve ever seen), then goes further and erases Atika and Sunflower, reducing the frequency of cropping. The ’10 does more of the same, but in an unforgivable move, repeats a shot two seconds after it ran. When I watched the BD and saw this, I thought I lost my mind and had to stop the disc and check.

In one of their best series, all projected on film, LACMA (RIP) ran an incredible print of the ’00. That was nearly 25 years ago. I may still conclude that the ’90 is a better representation of Fantasia, but I would love to see this version in 35mm again.

USC Theater is Still Timid AF

USC is staging the musical of Legally Blonde.

Their content warning (full screenshot):

“Please be advised that this production includes depictions and descriptions of academic pressure, sexism, abuse of power, and harassment. This production also contains flashing lights and haze.”

Students have to be warned about “descriptions of academic pressure???” What are they doing over there? All this kind of excessive CYA warning does is create people who grow up with no backbone and no gumption.

And that’s ignoring that the musical is significantly watered down from the movie, which had genuine struggle, tension, and wit. The musical is inoffensive puff.

Mobile Suit Gundam (1979, Right Stuf)

Grain Removal

De-grained by Q-Tec. The de-graining itself is kind of impressive. It leaves a significant amount of cel dust, film dirt, and doesn’t really destroy lines. In a way, it’s less destructive than many “faithful” restorations.

However, Q-Tec failed to de-grain every frame. For almost every shot, the first and last frames have intact grain. Shots begin with grain, but then melt into smeariness. It’s as if it constantly goes in and out of focus. Going from grain to no-grain also looks a lot like interpolation.

Continue reading